µØº¸µó¤é³ø­ì¤å, ¥t¦³·s»D»¡ Lexis-Nexis ¸ê°T¤½¥q©M¬ü°ê³Â¬Ùªº¤j¾Ç Tufts University ¤À§O¥¢¥h³¡¥÷¬ü°ê´¶Ã¹¤j²³ ©M ®դͪº­Ó¤H¸ê®Æ.Un11
©½t¥Í³N¼Æ¬ã¨sªÀ -- ³N¼Æ¬ã¨s¡@¡@ +q'mZ

Security Breach Hits Credit Cards)304G
By  Robin Sidel and Christopher Conkey3C5
Wall Street Journal , April 14, 2005  #OV-
©½t¥Í³N¼Æ¬ã¨sªÀ -- ³N¼Æ¬ã¨s¡@¡@ -nAr%_
HSBC Notifies 180,000 People Who Shopped At Ralph Lauren; Other Banks May Be Affected 

British financial giant HSBC PLC is notifying at least 180,000 people who used MasterCard credit cards to make purchases at Polo Ralph Lauren Corp. that criminals may have obtained access to their credit-card information, and that they should replace their cards. 

The situation -- which involves a General Motors-branded MasterCard that is one of the most widely held credit cards in the U.S. -- is the latest in a string of high-profile incidents in which personal data were stolen from retailers or financial institutions. Although HSBC and MasterCard declined to discuss when or how the apparent theft occurred, people with knowledge of the matter identified the retailer as Polo Ralph Lauren. A Polo spokeswoman declined to comment. 

The incident, which is thought to have taken place more than a month ago, is likely to further highlight the issue among regulators and politicians who are considering new rules to deal with identity theft. 

Although HSBC so far appears to be the only financial institution to disclose that it is alerting cardholders of the incident, credit cards issued by other banks also could be vulnerable. Under current rules, however, banks aren't necessarily required to alert their cardholders to the potential fraud. 

In a statement, Visa USA Inc. said it was aware of a "data security breach" and is "working with the merchant, law enforcement and the affected member financial institutions to monitor and prevent card-related fraud." 

HSBC said it was sending letters to 180,000 holders of cards branded by MasterCard and GM. The British bank manages six million GM-MasterCard branded cards in circulation. GM referred calls to HSBC. 

Stephen Cohen, an HSBC spokesman in New York, said the bank is "alerting cardholders as quickly as possible because we take the security of their accounts very seriously." He also said the bank is continuing to evaluate its other cards to determine if they may have been affected. 

The HSBC letter, which was sent to cardholders last week, reads in part: "A national retailer's computer system has had a security breach and your credit card account number may be among those that were compromised." It was signed by "GM Cardmember Services" and noted that HSBC issues the card and provides administrative and processing services for it. The letter went on to say that "we are unaware of any fraudulent activity on your account." 

A spokeswoman for MasterCard, an association that has thousands of banks as members, said it has "taken the necessary steps to inform all the [credt-card] issuers that could possibly be impacted by the potential database compromise." MasterCard and Visa both said U.S. cardholders are protected from liability for unauthorized transactions. 

Identity theft is a growing problem. Typically, criminals use stolen information to then fraudulently obtain credit cards, mortgage loans and auto loans, or simply to charge purchases to existing accounts. The Federal Trade Commission says 10 million people -- nearly 5% of the adult population -- discovered they were victims of identity theft in 2003. Other studies put the cost to consumers, banks and credit-card companies at more than $11 billion a year. 

Currently, only two laws mandate consumer notification when a breach occurs. The first is a two-year-old California statute requiring notification whenever electronic personal data are stolen. The second, a federal regulation requiring banks to inform consumers of breaches if it is "reasonably possible" that identity theft will result, took effect last month. 

While banks also are required to report breaches that occur in-house or at financial-service providers with whom they do business, HSBC technically wasn't required to notify GM MasterCard holders because the breach in question occurred at a separate retailer, not within the bank or the credit-card company. 

More than 20 states are considering legislation similar to the California law, which this year exposed a scandal involving ChoicePoint Inc., an Alpharetta, Ga., company that collects consumer data, and which said thieves had obtained information on about 145,000 people by posing as legitimate customers. This week, LexisNexis said 310,000 Americans, nearly 10 times its original estimate, had their personal and financial data accessed by unauthorized individuals via its computer systems. 

Sensitive data also have been compromised at some banks, mutual funds and universities. Last month, DSW Shoe Warehouse reported the theft of credit-card information from a database for 103 of the chain's 175 stores. 

Congress seems likely to put data brokers like LexisNexis and ChoicePoint under greater scrutiny this year, but debate is heating up over whether to impose a broader notification requirement on any business or government agency that handles personal information. 

At a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing yesterday, one frequent topic of discussion was a bill put forward by Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California that goes even further than the California law by expanding the definition of a breach to include encrypted data and paper records. Business groups are resigned to some kind of notification standard, but they are pushing hard for something along the lines of the banking regulations, which preserve some latitude for a bank to decide when a breach poses a threat to consumers. 

--- 

--Robin Sidel and Christopher Conkey 

Ellen Byron and Teri Agins contributed to this report. 

--- 

Foiling the Thieves 

Here are some steps to take if you learn that someone may have gotten access to your personal data: 

-- Contact the three major credit bureaus to place a fraud alert on your file. 

-- Check the compromised account to look for signs of fraudulent activity (and if you see any, call the company involved for help). 

-- Check your credit report frequently after the breach occurs in case thieves manage to open new accounts in your name. 
 
c

 ³o½g´£¤Î Tufts University ®դͤ]¨ü®`.FDvy
©½t¥Í³N¼Æ¬ã¨sªÀ -- ³N¼Æ¬ã¨s¡@¡@ bW"GN

LexisNexis Reveals Further Breaches of DatabaseShY
By  David Pringle and Rachel ZimmermanLtr//
Wall Street Journal , April 13, 2005 

LexisNexis said 310,000 Americans, nearly 10 times its^p
original estimate, have had their personal data0[o[7
accessed by unauthorized individuals via its computer|
systems, raising fresh concerns about the`~fi^K
data-collection industry's ability to guard againstq%xF
hackers amid a surge in identity-theft crimes. 
Separately, Tufts University sent a "precautionary"bgIxc
letter to alumni last week warning them that personalwz
information may have been stolen from a computer=Ke5
database used for fund raising. The letter, sent toFnk)H
about 106,000 graduates and other donors, says Tuftsjqg-
"detected abnormal activity" on a computer thatXD S[C
included names, addresses, Social Security and7xlu
credit-card numbers. 

The latest revelations are likely to give new urgency<j
to the clamor for laws to prevent data brokers fromqVo_'
amassing sensitive personal information without U%
consent and for better safeguards of other databases.6F
Recently, data broker ChoicePoint Inc. of Alpharetta,:nl
Ga., said identity thieves had obtained information on/SI~
about 145,000 people by posing as legitimatek
customers. Sensitive data also have been compromisedXJ=gC
at some banks, mutual funds and other universities. 

LexisNexis, a legal- and business-information providerBvbm
owned by Reed Elsevier PLC of the United Kingdom, saidw`
it has identified 59 security breaches over two yearsb'#c't
-- a rate of about one every two weeks -- making theU?xaP{
problem far more pervasive than it had previouslyO[t
realized. The accessed information included Socials|
Security, driver's license numbers and other personalfE/"!i
information. 

U.S. law-enforcement agencies are investigating the8R
breach, and Reed said it is offering fraud insurance4Q
and other services such as credit checks, free ofDnLqFP
charge, to individuals whose data were accessed byG+ B
unauthorized people. Reed's latest announcement comes;VwDG
five weeks after its initial disclosure that breachesB(p
had affected about 30,000 people. 

Once individual information has been purloined, it canH
be used by identity thieves to fraudulently obtainF8z3,/
credit cards, mortgage loans and car loans, amongtq '*
other things. The Federal Trade Commission estimatesfaA
27.3 million Americans were affected by identity theftD"^RIR
in the five years through 2003, with the pace of theftV
quickening toward the end of that period. 

Data brokers, which collect and sell personal%
information, represent a new and still largelyIo
unregulated industry -- but virtually every state isG
considering some kind of privacy legislation. In at;?1
least 20 states, the law would require companies to_'UeI
notify individuals when their personal information is-+Ks</
compromised, according to the Electronic PrivacyT19
Information Center, a public-interest research groupW
in Washington, D.C. Congress is also considering am#
federal notification standard, based on a CaliforniarR]uK
law that exposed the ChoicePoint breach. 

The Senate Judiciary Committee plans to hold a hearingqz7RKY
today on the recent wave of data breaches and on the`Q'qp
proposed legislation. 

Laws governing the collection and movement of personals
data are much stricter in Europe and the region hasn't`+%1x
had the spate of security breaches experienced in the"HPwXf
U.S. 

Data brokers such as LexisNexis promote their"5
"risk-management" services to banks, insurance{'T
companies, law-enforcement agencies and other;vf4
legitimate organizations that need to guard againstokVi
financial fraud. Banks, for instance, buy the data soqx?aE
they can run checks when deciding whether to approve a'k<"py
mortgage application. Reed executives say theY4oG
data-brokering business is an important tool indn|4D
preventing fraud. 

LexisNexis said it began investigating thousands oft
customers' accounts last month, after announcing thatWGO$x
information on 30,000 people held by its Seisint]p\O
data-brokering division may have been accessed byOb-l:
criminals. Yesterday Reed said that it had uncovered,Fy 
dozens of Seisint security breaches that predated itsm"
acquisition of the company late last year, as well asuh
a handful of incidents in other parts of LexisNexis./p
Kurt Sanford, head of U.S. corporate and federal~
markets for LexisNexis, said the company didn't haveJ=iz
any idea of the extent of the problem before the;
investigation. 

The security breaches typically took one of three"qOW
forms, Mr. Sanford said, all related to5tJM
misappropriation of passwords. In some cases, an"
unauthorized individual was able to access LexisNexis@(s
databases after figuring out a legitimate customer's\_
too-obvious password. In others, a former employee ofX^X<oo
a legitimate customer was able to continue accessingz9
the LexisNexis databases because the customer didn'tsN
change the account details after the employee left. InL
still others, criminals obtained an account{Z
administrator's identification details, allowing them\o0[
to create unauthorized accounts. 

LexisNexis executives say they are now monitoring9qu2
customers' usage patterns closely to spot anyE
irregular activity. They say they are also trying toaQn+dD
force customers to beef up their security by reviewing}_Ya
passwords monthly and requiring authorizations fromqO
two managers for each new account. 

LexisNexis said that so far none of the 30,000 people81jD
notified of a breach in December and January have comeYI*A
back to report instances of identity theft. PrivacyYliB.
advocates, however, say criminals don't always+
immediately use data they obtain, preferring sometimesF0~\E
to sell them on the Internet. Or, they say, a criminalft~E2
may open a credit card in an individual's name, buttM>qF
use a different address, so the individual doesn't seeJq
the credit-card statements and isn't aware of theN'i#
fraud. 

Reed's LexisNexis unit pushed deeply into datae518
brokering when it purchased Seisint Inc. of BocaB`]gy
Raton, Fla., for $775 million late last year. SeisintXMQ
was known for having some of the top software forsw_
searching databases. It also sold data searches for as[YBR[
little as 25 cents apiece. 

Reed said the financial cost of the breaches will beUJoj68
manageable and didn't change its earnings forecasts. 

At Tufts, Betsey Jay, director of advancementYY 
communications and donor relations, said there is "no'U
evidence that any data is being misused." Still, the8*l
letter urged alumni to contact their banks and check-b
credit reports for any signs of unauthorized activity..U#Vi_
©½t¥Í³N¼Æ¬ã¨sªÀ -- ³N¼Æ¬ã¨s¡@¡@ W
Ms. Jay said analysts detected "unusual activity,"QH
during routine checks on a server used for telephoneLcB49
fund raising that is owned by Tufts but managed by anRzQf;;
outside vendor. The suspicious activity -- &
specifically, large amounts of data moving through the9
machine -- occurred Oct. 31 and Dec. 19, she said. One>
theory was that someone was using the computer as aF&3I
distribution point for movies and other entertainmentgHlmYF
media, Ms. Jay said. At the time, Tufts decided there4[$T8\
wasn't enough evidence to notify alumni about theV8B
unusual activity. But, she said, after recent#H
revelations about security breaches at financial andM/
educational institutions, Tufts decided to alert its2Q@*8
donors. She said there is no evidence that theB@Y>|D
break-in was carried out by students, faculty members!0(
or employees. 

--- 

--David Pringle and Rachel Zimmerman 

Christopher Conkey contributed to this article.